Well, they are RELATIVELY accurate. And I’m not making excuses. If you look at the pictures I have taken of me in my shirts, and then where to look at the shirts in person, there is a slight difference in coloring… mainly due to the flash of my camera. The reason Pisces Beauty (which I also own) looks so similar to the picture and in person is because its almost entirely covered in ink that doesn’t reflect as much light. Honestly, you should just return your unwanted or disappointing shirts and get replacements, then its all good! Personally I have only had problems with one shirt being misprinted and never have returned a shirt in the 2 years I have been a customer, but this is a primarily subjective topic so I can understand.
Eembach, none of that is a an excuse. With Lightroom and photoshop, there’s no reason that the pictures shouldn’t be a relatively accurate depiction of the actual shirt. They have the tools and the original shirt. Besides, a flash is not likely to make colors more vivid. If anything, they would be more washed out. My guess is either the pictures are not of production shirts OR they’ve pumped up saturation.
Besides, the Pisces beauty shirt is almost identical to the picture, so clearly they can get it right.
Hey I saw some of your comments. You gotta keep in mind when your looking at these shirts that they are behind a pure white background, and that the model photos are taken by a professional photographer with a flash. It can be misleading if you picture the shirt looking the same in the environment it was photographed in, and out of the bag when it’s delivered. Kind of a dice roll sometimes. But more times than not they are a pleasant surprise, good luck on choosing your future shirts!
Cotton? Some long for the past. Music, movies and TV were all better. There's little doubt that a lot of great music was made back then. And there was ce...
5 Comments
Well, they are RELATIVELY accurate. And I’m not making excuses. If you look at the pictures I have taken of me in my shirts, and then where to look at the shirts in person, there is a slight difference in coloring… mainly due to the flash of my camera. The reason Pisces Beauty (which I also own) looks so similar to the picture and in person is because its almost entirely covered in ink that doesn’t reflect as much light. Honestly, you should just return your unwanted or disappointing shirts and get replacements, then its all good! Personally I have only had problems with one shirt being misprinted and never have returned a shirt in the 2 years I have been a customer, but this is a primarily subjective topic so I can understand.
Eembach, none of that is a an excuse. With Lightroom and photoshop, there’s no reason that the pictures shouldn’t be a relatively accurate depiction of the actual shirt. They have the tools and the original shirt. Besides, a flash is not likely to make colors more vivid. If anything, they would be more washed out. My guess is either the pictures are not of production shirts OR they’ve pumped up saturation.
Besides, the Pisces beauty shirt is almost identical to the picture, so clearly they can get it right.
THanks nilepez. I’m glad you liked it.=)
THanks nilepez. I’m glad you liked it.=)
Hey I saw some of your comments. You gotta keep in mind when your looking at these shirts that they are behind a pure white background, and that the model photos are taken by a professional photographer with a flash. It can be misleading if you picture the shirt looking the same in the environment it was photographed in, and out of the bag when it’s delivered. Kind of a dice roll sometimes. But more times than not they are a pleasant surprise, good luck on choosing your future shirts!